|
By Lucy West
While we worried about China
On
1 May 2004, the European
Union expanded to 25 countries and
now surpasses the United States as the richest trading block
in the world with 453 million people.

The new countries are from Eastern Europe like Estonia,
Lithuania, Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.
In their own language, “The European Union (EU) is
a family of democratic European countries, committed to working
together for peace and prosperity. It is not a State intended
to replace existing states, but it is more than any other
international organization. The EU is, in fact, unique. Its
Member States have set up common institutions to which they
delegate some of their sovereignty so that decisions on specific
matters of joint interest can be made democratically at European
level. This pooling of sovereignty is also called "European
integration”.”
In fact there has been very little sovereignty sacrifices
except when it comes to BUSINESS. The EU is pretty stalled
on social issues, but not when it comes to dealing with a
host of business, intellectual property and trade issues.
The power players squabble over power and the small nations
fret about the impact these nations will have on their power,
culture and ability to be heard. But mostly everybody wants
to make money!
Of course the current new inductees present some interesting
opportunities...they bring in a mostly cheaper workforce
into the wealthier configuration. This will present big social
problems for countries like Germany and France who have big
social welfare programs and current unrest when it comes
to ‘immigrant populations’. But the cheaper workforce
also is an insourcing in a sense of this less expensive labor
pool, unlike the US’s move to get cheap labor from
Mexico, Caribbean and Asia. What will be interesting to watch—will
the cheaper labor pool also drive the Walmartification of
the economy as in the US?
What will also be interesting will be how this helps to
unify US and Canadian relationships with Asia, aka China,
Korea, Taiwan, etc, since their trading relationships may
be a bit rockier. In spite of a bit of political noise, the
path of trade has been fairly smooth over the years for the
Asia Tigers and the Northern Titans to work with the US.
On the political side, the US in the form of Secretary Powell
keeps a regular milk run to Asia these days trying to create
a new configuration of interests. China and Japan are trying
to bury the old grudges, Pakistan and India. The US is also
quietly encouraging China to help ease the tension with North
Korea.
So in spite of really bad times with the Middle East, the
rest of the world wants to get on with making money! The
Middle East represents some of the poorest and highest unemployed
nations. They have virtually no manufacturing and of course,
except for the black curse, have virtually no business—21st
century trade (like IT), or farming or other raw materials.
Unlike Africa, who probably represents more promise overall,
due to enterprising populations who want to work, who have
raw materials, etc. The US policies would be better served
to try to create non-oil business relationships in the Middle
East—and that goes for Europa as well—all have
contributed to the hostile situations we have today.
But I digress, back to Europa.
EU has been evolving into this current configuration driven
by a desire for European peace and prosperity. But the ultimate
truth is—trade is the real reality.
(See History of Treaties as an addendum). The US should concern
itself as well with its sinking relationship with EU countries—and
soon. Spiteful actions on technology, etc., could create
big problems down the road.
- Addendum: Major Treaties for European Union
• The Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community
(ECSC), which was signed on 18 April 1951 in Paris, entered
into force on 23 July 1952 and expired on 23 July 2002;
- The
Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (EEC);
- The Treaty establishing
the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), which was
signed (along with the EEC Treaty)
in Rome on 25 March 1957, and entered into force on 1 January
1958. These Treaties are often referred to as the "Treaties
of Rome". When the term "Treaty of Rome" is
used, only the EEC Treaty is meant;
- The Treaty on European
Union, which was signed in Maastricht on 7 February
1992, entered into force on 1 November
1993. 'The Maastricht Treaty changed the name of the
European Economic
Community to simply "the European Community".
It also introduced new forms of co-operation between
the Member
State governments - for example on defence, and in
the area of "justice and home affairs". By
adding this inter-governmental co-operation to the
existing "Community" system,
the Maastricht Treaty created a new structure with
three "pillars" which
is political as well economic. This is the European
Union (EU).
Moreover, the founding treaties have been amended on
several occasions, in particular when new Member
States acceded in
1973 (Denmark, Ireland, United Kingdom), 1981 (Greece),
1986 (Spain, Portugal) and 1995 (Austria, Finland,
Sweden). There
have also been more far-reaching reforms bringing
major institutional changes and introducing new areas of
responsibility for the
European institutions:
.
©2004
ChainLink Research, Inc.
|